Answer
May 07, 2015 - 06:28 AM
I think I found the problem.
Apparently, it occurs (for graphs within definitions) when a new definition is created by copying and modifying an existing definition. If a definition is copied, all elements are the same as in the original. However, the connection between "Output Channel[s]" and graphs in the copied module do not work.
=> Solution: Delete all curves in copied graphs and re-"Ctrl + Drag-and-Drop" the Output Channels into the corresponding graphs.
Apparently, it occurs (for graphs within definitions) when a new definition is created by copying and modifying an existing definition. If a definition is copied, all elements are the same as in the original. However, the connection between "Output Channel[s]" and graphs in the copied module do not work.
=> Solution: Delete all curves in copied graphs and re-"Ctrl + Drag-and-Drop" the Output Channels into the corresponding graphs.
By
Problem occurred again, this time I have a simple circuit with a subcircuit from a separate lib which I created earlier. The subcircuit component contains graphs which work. Now if I create a copy of the definition in the lib and use it to replace the original one in the main circuit, the plots are not working anymore. I have absolutely no idea why - any suggestions?
By
I think I found the problem.
Apparently, it occurs when a new definition is created by copying and modifying an existing definition. If a definition is copied, all elements are the same as in the original. However, the connection between "Output Channel[s]" and graphs in the copied module do not work.
=> Solution: Delete all curves in copied graphs and re-"Ctrl + Drag-and-Drop" the Output Channels into the corresponding graphs.
Add New Comment